二次試験 | 語学検定協会

二次試験の実施概要

1級検定時間

1級検定時間

20分

準1級検定時間

準1級検定時間

20分

検定実施方式

オンライン

二次の受け方

面接官(Proctor)とは、すべて英語でコミュニケーションを行います。写真撮影・録音などはしてはいけません。検定当日、与えられた課題によってはメモをとっても良い場合があります。

STEP

検定予約

二次試験の検定時刻（面接）を予約システムから選択して予約を完了してください。

予約システムはメールにてリンクをお送りします。

※予約の確定は先着順となります。時間毎の枠には限りがございますので届きましたら早めにお手続きください。

STEP

予約に従い検定当日参加Zoom情報のご案内

予約情報に従い、受検者へメールにてZoom情報をお送りいたします。

STEP

接続の確認

ネット環境など、検定当日の準備をしてください。

STEP

検定当日

招待リンクから入室し、指示に従い検定を実施してください。

招待リンクを押すと待機室にまず参加します。面接官(Proctor)の入室許可をお待ちください。

STEP

結果

結果通知書は、検定後約2週間以内にメールで評価表と共に送られます。

幼保英語検定　（ECEC-E）二次試験の位置づけ

二次試験は、単なる会話力や流暢さのみを評価するものではありません。Professional Presence、状況判断、関係構築、説明、相手への配慮を、実際のECEC場面を想定して総合的に評価します。

想定場面

級	想定される役割・場面	評価基準
準1級	5歳児クラス／Teacher	子どもの反応を見て柔軟に関わる力、適切な状況判断に基づく言葉と行動、子どもに安心感を与える表現
準1級	5歳児クラス／Teacher	子どもの反応を見て柔軟に関わる力、適切な状況判断に基づく言葉と行動、子どもに安心感を与える表現
1級	Director／マネジメント／保護者対応	教育方針や判断を分かりやすく説明する力、不安や質問への落ち着いた対応、一貫性・誠実さ・専門性
1級	Director／マネジメント／保護者対応	教育方針や判断を分かりやすく説明する力、不安や質問への落ち着いた対応、一貫性・誠実さ・専門性

評価項目・配点概要

区分	配点	主な評価観点
Section 1	20点	Professional communication、状況理解・判断、言語運用、関係構築、Professional presence
Section 1	20点
Section 2	10点	説明・応答の一貫性、専門的根拠、相手への配慮、柔軟性、全体的な実践力
Section 2	10点	説明・応答の一貫性、専門的根拠、相手への配慮、柔軟性、全体的な実践力

Section 1（20 points）	＋	Section 2（10 points）	＝	Total（30 points）
		Passing Line	＝	18＋

Rubrics

スクロールできます

Score	Language Accuracy	Child Engagement & Communication	Organization & Clarity	Content & Educational Purpose
0	Unable to use basic grammar or vocabulary to communicate the task.	Makes little or no attempt to engage children.	Presentation lacks structure and is difficult to follow.	Provides little or no relevant content.
1	Frequent grammatical and vocabulary errors significantly interfere with communication.	Limited eye contact, gestures, or vocal variation. Engagement is minimal.	Ideas are poorly organized and often unclear.	Content is limited, inaccurate, or not appropriate for the task.
2	Some grammatical and vocabulary errors occasionally interfere with communication.	Attempts to engage children through some eye contact, gestures, or questioning.	Some organization is evident, but explanations may be difficult to follow at times.	Provides basic content but lacks sufficient detail or educational value.
3	Minor grammatical and vocabulary errors do not interfere with communication.	Uses eye contact, gestures, questioning, and an appropriate tone to maintain children’s attention.	Information is logically organized and generally easy for children to follow.	Provides appropriate content that supports the intended learning goal.
4	Uses grammar and vocabulary accurately and appropriately throughout the presentation.	Actively engages children through eye contact, gestures, questioning, enthusiasm, and child-friendly delivery.	Presentation is clear, well-organized, and easy for children to understand and follow.	Provides rich, age-appropriate content that clearly supports the intended learning goal and children’s understanding.
5	Uses grammar and vocabulary accurately, naturally, and appropriately throughout the presentation.	Creates a highly engaging, interactive, and supportive learning environment through confident, natural, and age-appropriate communication.	Presentation is exceptionally clear, well structured, and delivered smoothly, making it highly engaging and easy for children to follow.	Provides comprehensive, engaging, and developmentally appropriate content that strongly supports the learning goal and promotes children’s active participation and understanding.
Total｜20 points

スクロールできます

Score	Communication Effectiveness	Supporting Reasons
0	Unable to express an opinion or respond to the question.	Provides no reason or support for the opinion.
1	Expresses little or no clear opinion. Communication is difficult to understand.	Provides a reason, but it is unclear, irrelevant, or extremely limited.
2	Expresses an opinion, but communication is limited or unclear at times.	Provides a simple reason with limited explanation.
3	Expresses an opinion clearly and communicates ideas with minor difficulties.	Provides relevant reasons and some explanation to support the opinion.
4	Expresses an opinion clearly and effectively. Ideas are easy to understand.	Provides clear reasons and appropriate examples to support the opinion.
5	Expresses an opinion confidently and effectively with clear, well-developed communication throughout.	Provides well-developed reasons and relevant examples that strongly support the opinion.
Total｜10 points

スクロールできます

Score	Language Accuracy	Professional Judgment & Communication	Organization & Clarity	Content & Leadership
0	Unable to use basic grammar or vocabulary to communicate the task.	Demonstrates little or no understanding of the situation or appropriate professional response.	Presentation lacks structure and is difficult to follow.	Provides little or no relevant response to the situation.
1	Frequent grammatical and vocabulary errors significantly interfere with communication.	Responds with limited professional judgment. Communication is unclear or inappropriate for the situation.	Ideas are poorly organized and often unclear.	Response is limited, inappropriate, or demonstrates little understanding of the situation.
2	Some grammatical and vocabulary errors occasionally interfere with communication.	Demonstrates some professional judgment and communicates appropriate actions with limited explanation.	Some organization is evident, but explanations may be difficult to follow at times.	Provides basic responses but lacks sufficient detail, accuracy, or professional consideration.
3	Minor grammatical and vocabulary errors do not interfere with communication.	Demonstrates sound professional judgment and communicates appropriate actions clearly and confidently.	Information is logically organized and generally easy to follow.	Provides appropriate responses that address the situation and support effective leadership.
4	Uses grammar and vocabulary accurately and appropriately throughout the presentation.	Demonstrates excellent professional judgment, prioritizes actions effectively, and communicates confidently and professionally throughout the presentation.	Presentation is clear, well-organized, and easy to follow.	Provides comprehensive, practical, and well-reasoned responses that clearly support children’s safety, staff development, and effective program leadership.
5	Uses grammar and vocabulary accurately, naturally, and appropriately throughout the presentation.	Demonstrates outstanding professional judgment by analyzing the situation thoroughly, prioritizing actions effectively, and communicating decisions confidently, professionally, and persuasively.	Presentation is exceptionally clear, well structured, and delivered smoothly, with ideas presented in a logical and coherent sequence throughout.	Provides comprehensive, practical, and well-reasoned responses that demonstrate strong leadership and contribute to continuous program improvement.
Total｜20 points

スクロールできます

Score	Communication Effectiveness	Professional Reasoning
0	Unable to respond meaningfully to the question.	Provides little or no reasoning or comparison of the two approaches.
1	Expresses little or no clear opinion. Communication is difficult to understand.	Provides limited reasoning that is unclear, irrelevant, or demonstrates little understanding of the two approaches.
2	Expresses a preference, but communication is limited or unclear at times.	Provides simple reasoning with limited comparison or explanation.
3	Explains a preferred approach clearly and communicates ideas with minor difficulties.	Compares the two approaches and provides relevant reasons to support the preferred approach.
4	Explains the preferred approach clearly and effectively. Ideas are easy to understand.	Demonstrates sound professional reasoning by comparing both approaches, justifying the preferred approach, and providing appropriate examples or professional considerations.
5	Explains the preferred approach confidently and effectively with clear, well-developed communication throughout.	Demonstrates excellent professional reasoning by thoughtfully evaluating both approaches, recognizing their advantages and limitations, and providing well-developed justification supported by relevant examples.
Total｜10 points